Bryan Beatty, CFP®, AIF®, a partner with Egan Berger & Weiner, was recently named one of Financial Times Top 400 Financial Advisers for 2018.*
No matter where you turn these days, you can’t escape the debate between those who believe there is inflation, and those who claim there isn’t. So which is it?
That depends on whom you talk to, and how they define inflation.
- If you believe that inflation is a general rise in the price of everyday goods and services, as measured by the consumer price index (CPI), then you would say no.
- If you believe that the definition of inflation in #1 is basically sound, but that the CPI is wrong (we shouldn’t exclude food, energy, and housing since we all need those things), you might say yes.
- But if you define inflation as decreased purchasing power over time, caused by an increase in the money supply—then you would definitely say yes.
I believe option #3 is correct, but there are some conditions to be mindful of before making investment decisions based on inflation.
Even though the money supply is three times the size it was in the beginning of 2008, inflation isn’t widespread because the additional money has not circulated through the economy very well. That’s because the economy isn’t healthy enough yet, though we have seen inflation of assets such as stocks and commodities.
I think we are having the wrong debate, however, because the definition of inflation isn’t as important as identifying the warning signs of inflation and making sure our investments are as protected as possible.
To understand this point, we must first distinguish between sickness and symptom. In terms of inflation, a rise in general asset price is a symptom. Its cause, or sickness, is a weaker dollar or an increase in the money supply, which typically creates inflation.
Like many physical diseases, sometimes the symptoms take years to develop to a point where they can be felt and a disease diagnosed. And this is the real hidden danger of inflation, because the longer it takes for inflationary symptoms to appear—the worse it is for American consumers.
Fortunately, there are early warning signs of inflation.
A good indicator is asset prices—such as stocks, commodities, and real estate. If prices are rising, and the demand for them is relatively unchanged, then this can be an early warning sign. We have seen rising real estate and stock prices, while widespread economic growth has been somewhat nonexistent.
Many people will ignore those warning signs or misinterpret them as something else entirely, but when general prices such as those measured by the CPI begin to rise, there will be little then that you can do to protect your money.
And since the Federal Reserve policy is to increase the money supply over time, usually in a controlled and disciplined fashion, we have the opportunity now to protect your financial plan and assets against inflation.
There are winners and losers in a high-inflation economy. Be a winner!
In a high-inflation economy, losers are those who:
• Live on a fixed income.
• Don’t have investments.
• Have their savings in an account with a low interest rate.
The winners in an inflationary economy are those who:
• Have fixed-cost loans—such as mortgages. The value of the asset (property) goes up, while the monthly cost of the loan goes down when wages rise by comparison.
• Have investments, particularly broadly diversified mutual funds, that invest in mostly stocks.
Winners maintain the purchasing power of their dollars, so they can continue to buy the things they need and want in the future, even in an inflationary economy.
Bryan D Beatty, CFP® AIF®
The Financial Times 400 is intended to provide a snapshot of the best financial advisers for the investors who use them — such as FT readers. We assess advisers based on what investors care about, and we use a quantifiable, objective methodology.
The Financial Times and Ignites Research, the FT’s sister company, contacted the largest US brokerages in autumn 2017 to obtain practice information and data for their top advisers across the US. This resulted in verified data on assets under management instead of relying on advisers’ self-reported figures.
We asked for information on advisers with more than 10 years’ experience and who had more than $300m in assets under management. Such minimum criteria filtered out most advisers. The FT then invited qualifying advisers out of this group — a list that totaled about 880 — to complete a questionnaire that gave us more information about their practices.
We added that information to our own research on the candidates, including data from regulatory filings. The formula the FT uses to grade advisers is based on six broad factors and calculates a numeric score for each adviser. The factors are:
- Assets under management can signal experience managing money and client trust.
- AUM growth rate (we look at both one-year and two-year growth rates) can be taken as a proxy for performance, asset retention and ability to generate new business.
- Years of experience indicate experience managing assets in different economic and interest-rate environments.
- Compliance record provides evidence of past client disputes. A string of complaints could signal problems.
- Industry certifications (CFA, CFP etc) demonstrate technical and industry knowledge and obtaining these designations shows a professional commitment to investment skills.
- Online accessibility illustrates commitment to providing investors with easy access and transparent contact information.
Assets under management accounted for an average of 70 per cent of each adviser’s score. AUM growth rate accounted for an average of 17 per cent.
Additionally, the FT places a cap on the number of advisers from any one state that roughly corresponds to the distribution of millionaires across the US.
We present the FT 400 as an elite group, not a competitive ranking. We acknowledge that ranking the industry’s top advisers from one to 400 would be a futile exercise, since each takes different approaches to their practice and has different specializations. The research was conducted on behalf of the Financial Times by Ignites Research, a Financial Times sister publication.